How we write and where our numbers come from

Short answer

Knowledge base articles rest first on meta-analyses and position stands, and every number from a study is checked in the paper itself. The author reads and approves every text before it goes live. Training log data is published only as aggregates of 50+ people.

Who is responsible for these pages

I'm Arkadiusz Chrabąszczewski, the creator of SmartWorkout. I run the knowledge base and approve every Polish text. I have been programming for about 10 years, have lifted for years and keep up with strength training research. Our advice rests on research and on training log data, not on what worked for one person, so every claim about what works carries a citation. More about me and why I built the app is on the author page.

How an article is made

Every article goes through the same 6 steps.

  1. We collect the questions people type into search engines about the topic and check what the existing answers leave out.
  2. For every claim we record the paper, its exact sentence and its PubMed ID or DOI in a source sheet.
  3. We write the text following our style guide and a list of facts about the app.
  4. We check every number separately: against the sentence in the paper, the app's code or the result of a data query. Plan fragments are pasted into the app's plan import and compared with the preview.
  5. Editing removes filler and keeps the terms straight: a set is a set, tonnage is weight times reps, and volume is the number of sets.
  6. The author reads the whole Polish text next to the source sheet and approves it or corrects it.

How we check numbers

The author reads and approves every Polish text, and we check every number in the source or in the app's data. A number we cannot point to in a paper, in the app's code or in a query result is cut, however plausible it sounds.

How we choose and read research

Claims about what works, how big the effect is and how tiring it is rest first on meta-analyses and position stands of scientific organizations, and only then on single studies.

Source What we use it for
Meta-analysis, systematic review the verdict and the main numbers; our volume zones rest on the meta-analysis of 67 studies by Pelland et al. 2025
Position stand of a scientific organization recommendations for healthy adults, such as ACSM 2026 on volume, load, failure and rest
Single study a detail the reviews do not measure: a specific protocol, exercise or group, always stating who was studied
Method author, guide, company page only where a name or method comes from, such as the zone names MV, MEV, MAV and MRV from Renaissance Periodization; never as proof that something works

We check every number from a study in the paper itself, in the full text or in its abstract. We take no numbers from other people's summaries or from memory; if we can't find the number in the paper, we leave it out. Every citation leads to PubMed, PMC, a DOI or the official page of a position stand, and the full source list sits at the bottom of every page.

In the "What the research says" section we give the type of study, the number of participants and the duration, and we end with one sentence on what the research does not show yet. Statistics such as effect sizes or confidence intervals appear only there; in the other sections we describe the result in words, with one plain number.

Advice without a citation is our practice

A tip in the steps, examples, exercise tables or common mistakes that has no citation is our practice: a choice that fits the research results but is not itself a research result. That is how we pick, for example, the exercises for examples and the kilograms in tables. Where our choice could easily be mistaken for a research finding, we say so: the "Source" column of the key numbers table then reads "our practice".

We state SmartWorkout rules as rules and always give the reason. We count a whole drop set as 1 set, because there is no rest between the drops; the reasoning and sources are in the article on how to count sets. When our advice goes further than the research or against it, we say so in the same place.

Where the SmartWorkout log data comes from

The "SmartWorkout data" boxes show how people who log their workouts in the app actually train. We compute them with read-only queries, usually over the last 90 days, and run the same set of queries once a year; the period is stated in every box.

The numbers in the boxes therefore describe mostly men from Poland who train in a gym, not an average of everyone who lifts. Where women train clearly differently, as with volume, we give their results separately.

Definitions in the data boxes

Every box uses the same definitions, and its "Sample" line says which group it covers.

Term How we count it
Active person at least 1 workout with logged sets in the data period
Regular trainee at least 10 workouts in the data period
Training week a week starting on Monday with at least 1 workout; weeks without training, such as a vacation, do not lower the average
Working set every set not marked as a warm-up; in weekly sets per muscle group a whole drop set is 1 set (the drops don't add extra sets), and in the other data boxes the drops count separately, but they are less than 1% of logged sets
Weekly sets per muscle group 1 set for a muscle group trained directly, 0.5 for one trained indirectly, 0 for timed exercises; for each person the average over their training weeks, only for people with at least 8 such weeks
Direct and indirect muscle group from the exercise atlas: direct when the exercise works the muscle group at 70 or more points out of 100, indirect at 30-69 points (full set and half set)
RIR from an RPE rating RIR is 10 minus RPE, the same conversion the app uses (RIR vs RPE)
Estimated 1RM (e1RM) the Epley formula, weight × (1 + reps / 30), from working sets of up to 10 reps; the 1RM calculator and the app average several formulas, so their result can differ slightly
Exercise group type by the app's rule: when all exercises share one main muscle group, it is a compound set, tri-set or giant set; when they do not, a superset or circuit
Workout duration from start to finish of the workout in the log, only for workouts lasting 10 to 240 minutes
Median the middle value: half of the people are below it, half above; one very active person does not move it

In the wiki's advice a working set has one more condition: it ends with at most 4 reps in reserve (which sets count as working sets). We cannot check that in the logs because only a minority logs RIR, so log data counts sets more broadly than our advice does.

Privacy: aggregates only

Only aggregate numbers reach the site: percentages, medians and the ranges that hold the middle half of people. Every table row and every cell with a percentage covers at least 50 people; we do not show the result of a smaller group at all, even when it would be interesting.

We do not publish single workouts or plans, names, account names or exercises that users created themselves. We exclude deleted workouts and our own internal and test accounts. In numbers about plans we take only plans that people build themselves in the plan creator: no ready plans from the library and no coach account templates, because most of them are the same sample plans.

What log data cannot show

Log data describes how people train. Conclusions about cause and effect, meaning what works, come only from research: the sentence "in workouts with supersets the same person needed less time per working set" describes an association and does not mean that supersets by themselves shorten a workout.

  • A log is a record. If someone does not mark warm-ups, drop sets or tempo, the data does not have them, and warm-ups logged as normal sets inflate the working sets.
  • A minority logs RIR and tempo. These numbers describe the people who log them, usually more engaged than average.
  • Templates on the query date. We read the targets and rest times in templates as they are on the day of the query, not on the day of the workout.
  • Strength gains are counted from the first entry. The first time an exercise is logged in the app is not the start of someone's training, and people who stopped logging drop out of the comparison.

Versions in other languages

Versions in other languages are translated from the Polish version the author approved; this English page is one of them. Facts, numbers, sources and data boxes are the same in every language; what changes are the example questions, the exercise names from the atlas in that language and the app's button labels. In the German or Spanish version too, the log data comes mostly from Poland, and we describe it that way.

Updates and corrections

Every article shows the date of its last update and, when something important changed, one sentence on what it was. The tables of volume zones, the RIR to RPE conversion and the exercise group names are not copied into articles: the site builds them from one place in the code with the same rules as the app, so a change to a rule changes them on every page at once. We review sources once a quarter and check feature descriptions against the app version available on the App Store and Google Play on the day of the update.

Log it in SmartWorkout

A free workout log for iPhone and Android: sets, RIR, tempo, exercise groups and plans.

app-storegoogle-play

Questions

Where do the numbers in the SmartWorkout data boxes come from?

From the training logs of people who use the app, counted as aggregates, usually over the last 90 days. Most of them are men from Poland who train in a gym, so read the numbers as a picture of that group.

Can anyone see my workouts on this site?

No. Only percentages and medians for groups of at least 50 people reach the site, with no names, account names or single workouts.

Why do some tips have no citation?

Because they are our own choices in places where research gives no specific answer, such as which exercise to use in an example. A claim that something works better always has a citation.

Sources

  1. Pelland JC, Remmert JF, Robinson ZP, et al. The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains. Sports Med. 2026;56(2):481-505 (online 2025).
  2. Currier BS, D'Souza AC, Singh MAF, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand. Resistance Training Prescription for Muscle Function, Hypertrophy, and Physical Performance in Healthy Adults: An Overview of Reviews. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2026;58(4):851-872.